District Attorney General
   7th Judicial District of Tennessee   

Judicial Ethics Opinion

JUDICIAL ETHICS OPINION

IT IS ETHICALLY IMPROPER FOR JUVENILE COURT JUDGE TO APPOINT AND SUPERVISE YOUTH SERVICES OFFICERS APPEARING IN HIS OR HER COURT AND/OR TO RUN YOUTH PROBATION PROGRAM

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE: Juvenile Court. CRIMINAL SENTENCING: PROBATION. Inquiry has been made as to propriety of juvenile court judges and their employees supervising probation and other programs for juveniles whom they have placed on any type of probation. Included in this issue is appointment and supervision of probation officers for juvenile court. Pursuant to TCA 37-1-162(a) , state provides participating counties with supplemental funds each year for improvement of juvenile court services. In accepting funds, juvenile court is statutorily required to employ youth services officer--who serves same role as probation officer serves for adults--to be appointed and supervised by court. Implementation of these statutory requirements gives appearance of impropriety in violation of Code of Judicial Conduct, Canon 2. If youth services officer makes recommendations concerning disposition of juvenile's case to juvenile court judge who employs and supervises officer, it could be argued that ultimate decision to adjudicate juvenile delinquent was not made neutrally and impartially. It could also be argued that juvenile court judge gives great or greater deference to any recommendation of youth services officer he or she has appointed and/or supervises. For these same reasons, it is also ethically improper for juvenile court judge to supervise entire juvenile probation program. Juvenile court judge who appoints and supervises youth services officers appearing in his or her court and/or runs youth probation program is not acting "in a manner that promotes pubic confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary." Better practice would be to allow executive branch to employ, supervise, and operate each county's probation program. (JUDICIAL ETHICS COMMITTEE ADVISORY OPINION 98-05, 23 tam 51-59, 11/13/98, Peay, 2 PAGES.)


Note: See the related topic on LOCAL ALLOCATION OF RESOURCES FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE IN ANDERSON COUNTY


Return To Juvenile Court Issue Page