December 29, 1998
Honorable Pat Hess
Juvenile Court Judge
Anderson County Courthouse
Clinton, TN 37716
Dear Judge Hess,
Beginning January 1, 1999, my Assistant Beth Boatner will no
longer be primarily assigned to Juvenile Court. A representative
from our office will be available, however, on Wednesdays to handle
the prosecution of adults charged in Juvenile Court and juveniles
charged with offenses that would be felonies if committed by an
adult. Beth will have more responsibilities in the sessions
court area.
This reassignment of duties is necessitated by the lack of prosecutorial
resources provided to the Seventh Judicial District and our need
to prioritize, especially in view of the recent passage of the
constitutional amendment respecting victims' rights.
Anderson County has chosen to fund three full time judges,
two for General Sessions Court and one for Juvenile Court. These
courts handle (A) juvenile delinquency, truancy and unruliness
and some custody matters (Juvenile Court) and (B) non-jury misdemeanor
jurisdiction and limited non-jury civil jurisdiction (General
Sessions Court).
This is a very generous judicial allotment for courts of limited
civil and criminal jurisdiction in a county this size. By contrast
there are only two State judges in the courts of general,
civil and criminal jurisdiction in Anderson County (jurisdiction
over all civil and criminal cases, including divorces, indicted
misdemeanors and all felony cases, all civil and criminal jury
trials, post-conviction relief petitions from the state penitentiary
and appeals from the General Sessions and Juvenile Courts).
In addition, the voters amended the Tennessee Constitution on
November 3, 1998, creating extra Victims' Rights responsibilities
upon the prosecutor's office which will have immeasurable consequences
to the criminal justice process. The Juvenile Court is not a
criminal court.
The Anderson County District Attorney's office has historically
provided attorneys to prosecute delinquency and status offenses
in Juvenile Court and criminal cases in Sessions Court. This
practice dates from when the county had one full-time Sessions
judge who also handled Juvenile Court, (Jennings Meredith)-the
work that now takes three judges. Now our prosecutorial resources
are stretched and we can no longer continue unchanged our coverage
of the county courts since these three county full-time judges
have recently extended their regular court days and multiplied
"special settings" on other days and now our office
is encumbered by additional duties under the Victims Rights Amendment.
The District Attorney is a State official (paid by the State)
and not a county employee. The number of attorneys which the
State of Tennessee allocates to a District Attorney's office is
tied to the number of State court judges (in our case 2),
not to the number of judges a county chooses to fund. The primary
duty of the District Attorney is to attend to the State Courts
where all felonies are prosecuted as well as many misdemeanors.
Next we have a duty to prosecute adults charged with criminal
offenses in Sessions Court; in addition, there are sometimes
state duties taking our attorneys out of the Seventh District
to courts in other counties by designation . Juvenile court prosecutions
are not criminal cases under the law, and the juvenile court is
not a state court.
Very few prosecutors in Tennessee, and usually only those in
larger counties, regularly appear in juvenile court. Those which
do often have special county-funded prosecuting attorneys for
the purpose. Our office has been providing attorneys in Juvenile
Court for status offenses (defined as acts which would not be
criminal if committed by an adult). These are primarily truancy
and unruliness. In this matter I can, as District Attorney, exercise
the charging discretion I have under the Constitution and Statutes
of Tennessee. Please see Attorney General's opinion U96-044 (Burson),
dated June 5, 1996, copy attached. We have been electing to prosecute
even though the law provides that other attorneys are available
for these cases. In fact, the county attorney, city attorney
or any other attorney approved by the Court can handle any case
in Juvenile Court so long as the District Attorney does not object
or intervene. See Rule 19 of the Rules of Juvenile Procedure.
When schools elect to prosecute status offenses, it may be appropriate
for that school's attorney to prosecute as a routine part of
his or her job description.
I would be amenable to discussing with the County Commission the
possibility of funding another full-time attorney (or various
part-time attorneys) to work through my office to cover Juvenile
Court. The County Commission and the several Boards of Education
need to recognize, as the State Legislature does, that as you
multiply the number of judges, and increase the caseload and the
duties of the district attorney, the number of prosecutors needs
to increase.
These issues were raised by me years ago at the several League
of Women Voters and other public forums held around the county
during the effort to create the Sessions Court Division II in
1993 and 1994. On November 5, 1998, this problem was discussed
among several educators from around the county (Pat Swinney also
was present) at the Truancy Workshop held at the Haley Farm.
As a result of that meeting my staff and I decided that for right
now, we will cease prosecuting only status offenses and misdemeanor
offenses against juveniles in Juvenile Court.
We reserve the right to prosecute felony cases and to initiate
transfer proceedings in cases pursuant to TCA 37-1-134 and Rule
24 of the Rules of Juvenile Procedure. This practice is consistent
with the Committee Comment to Rule 19 TRJP which states in pertinent
part that
the district attorney may want to be involved to the extent of
electing to prosecute very serious cases for the state or to initiate
transfer proceedings in such cases, and may choose for this purpose
to arrange for copies of all petitions filed in cases involving
offenses which would be felonies if committed by adults to be
sent to him.
We will also handle the prosecution of adults charged with child
abuse and contributing to the delinquency of a minor in Juvenile
Court.
In no way am I minimizing the importance of these juvenile laws
even though they are not criminal in nature. But with limited
resources our priority has to be criminal prosecution. No one
other than the district attorney can prosecute crime in Anderson
County, but the law does allow others to handle these juvenile
matters.
Very truly yours,
James N. Ramsey
District Attorney General
JNR/tg
cc: Police Departments
School Departments
attachment: Attorney General Opinion, U96-044, June 5, 1996